TNFA speaking at Devex. View More →

Ambitious. Effective. Built to End.

Since 1961 USAID was America's premier foreign assistance agency. Its successes were real; so were its failures.

For those of us who support foreign assistance, it is tempting to bring back what USAID was. That's not good enough.

It's time for what comes next. The New Foreign Assistance is the conservative voice for reform.

The Record

What went right.

American foreign assistance has produced some of the most successful international programs in history. The numbers tell the story.

26 million

Lives saved by PEPFAR

Since 2003, a $100 billion bipartisan investment has supported 20.6 million people on antiretroviral therapy.

Diplomatic ceremony outdoors

940,000

Malaria deaths prevented

The President's Malaria Initiative prevented an estimated 185 million cases between 2005 and 2017.

Healthcare worker with a woman and child

$17 in benefits

Per dollar invested

Development Innovation Ventures funded evidence-backed solutions and let results speak.

Morphat at the factory

Factory 19: Morphat at the factory. Photo: Mia Collis / Essential

These three programs don't capture everything.

The Millennium Challenge Corporation pioneered conditional aid that rewarded country reform. Feed the Future lifted 23.4 million people out of poverty through agriculture-led growth. Prosper Africa, launched under the first Trump administration, mobilized American private capital across the continent. The Higher Education Solutions Network put America's top universities on the hardest development questions.

When American foreign assistance has been focused and bipartisan, it has changed outcomes at scale.

The Diagnosis

What Went Wrong. What Comes Next.

USAID's failures were not about its people or its mission. They were about the slow accretion of rules, mandates, and reporting requirements that, over decades, crowded out the work of development. Each well-meaning reform added a layer…nothing was ever removed.

Milton Friedman
“One of the great mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results.”
Milton FriedmanThe Open Mind, 1975

What went wrong

  • Programs were spread too thin
  • Too much focus on internal bureaucracy, not external impact
  • Viewed development as a top-down technocratic puzzle, not an emergent phenomenon to be unleashed
  • Programs detached from foreign policy

What comes next

  • Targeted programs that move the needle on major challenges
  • Fast and flexible design and procurement; pay for what works
  • Partner with the private sector, remove barriers to entrepreneurship and investment
  • Focus on trade, not aid; bilateral partnership

The Evidence

What opening an economy looks like from space.

Satellite night lights over India in 1992: scattered points of light, mostly dark
India, 1992, at the end of the License Raj
Satellite night lights over India in 2023: cities and highways lit across the country
India, 2023

Night lights: Chen et al. (2024), Scientific Data. Same scale both years.

01

Focus on Economic Growth

Trading partners and allies, not a
global safety net.

02

Do What Only Governments Can

Public goods and systems change.
Leave the rest to civil society and
competent local governments.

03

Commercial First

Work through markets where
markets can deliver. Support them;
don't displace them.

04

Partner with Reformers, Not
Failing States

Reformers earn deeper partnership.
Predatory governments do not.

05

Assess Everything, End What
Doesn't Work

Set clear objectives. Measure outcomes. Reallocate from what fails to what works.

06

Finite by Design

Clear end dates. Self-reliance is the
goal, not permanent dependency.

Read the full framework

Live Tracker

It's being built. Track it in real time.

Every major foreign assistance commitment, pledge, and policy from the State Department since it took over from USAID. Updated weekly.

Open the tracker

The Long View

Two centuries of economic growth

In 1820, every region was poor. Since then, average incomes have risen everywhere — at very different rates.

Source: Maddison Project Database (Bolt & van Zanden, 2023), via Our World in Data. GDP per capita in 2011 international dollars.

Contact

For press inquiries, partnership opportunities, or to learn more about our work.

contact@thenewforeignassistance.org